We live in a time where information is everywhere but clarity is scarce. Every headline, news report, and every viral video seems to come with its own flavour of bias. Between corporate interests, government spin, and the rise of alternative outlets with their own agendas, it’s no wonder people feel lost.

What is evident is that separating truth from noise isn’t easy and often it’s damned near impossible. Objective thinking really is a life skill. And just like learning to cook a healthy meal or managing your finances, learning how to navigate the current media landscape is essential if you want to have grounded conversations about the world, especially if you want to prevent yourself from slowly going mad.

Why it matters

When we can’t tell what’s true, we become easy to manipulate. When confusion itself is a used as a hammer that ensures that people feel they can’t trust anyone, they will disengage and leave the narrative unchallenged. On the other side, blind trust in a single source leads to one-dimensional thinking that does nothing to remove the blinders.

Truth-seeking doesn’t mean you’ll always get the full picture. It means you’ll be less likely to be misled, and more confident in your own understanding.

Six ways to cut through the noise

1. Accept that everyone has bias

There’s no such thing as a perfectly neutral news outlet. Mainstream media may lean towards corporate and government interests; alternative outlets often push activist or ideological perspectives. Instead of hunting for “pure objectivity,” ask: what angle is this story coming from, and who benefits from me seeing it this way?

2. Compare, don’t just consume

Truth often lives in the gaps between perspectives. Read across the spectrum: a mainstream outlet, a critical alternative source, and an international publication. If they all agree on a detail, it’s probably solid. If they differ, the differences tell you what’s politically charged.

3. Look for primary sources

Where possible, go back to the raw material: government reports, scientific studies, court documents, or video evidence from the ground. Don’t rely only on how one outlet interprets them.

4. Watch for loaded language

Words like shocking, heroic, brutal, or unprovoked aren’t facts at all – they’re persuasion. If you strip away the adjectives, what’s left? ^[4]

5. Notice the grammar

Language frames reality. Many outlets use the passive voice to obscure responsibility, especially in stories about violence against women. Think of the difference between:

“Woman attacked while walking dog” vs. “Man attacks woman while she’s walking her dog.”

The first makes it sound like something that just “happened to her”, almost as if it was her own fault. The second names the perpetrator. Pay attention to how grammar subtly shifts blame or erases accountability, it becomes quite a different story.

6. Slow down

The fastest takes are often the least accurate. Initial reports get corrected, details shift, and sometimes whole narratives collapse. Give space for investigations that take weeks or months.^[6].

7. Stay curious, not cynical

It’s tempting to throw your hands up and say “they’re all lying.” But that’s just another trap. The truth is out there, but it takes patience and practice. Cultivate curiosity: what’s missing here? what evidence would help me decide?

8. Recognise the bot farms

It’s not just sloppy journalism that muddies the waters — it’s deliberate campaigns. Bot farms and troll networks push divisive posts, often designed to trigger anger or fear. Their aim isn’t always to convince you of a lie — sometimes it’s simply to exhaust you, so you stop trying to find truth at all.

When you see a sudden surge of near-identical comments or emotionally loaded memes, pause: is this real grassroots outrage, or am I watching a digital puppet show?

9. Watch political manipulation amplified by AI

We’re now seeing leaders use AI-fuelled social media posts to pump out rage, distortion, and fantasy at industrial speed. In the U.S., Donald Trump’s increasingly erratic public statements (and their synthetic amplification) have reignited calls for the 25th Amendment to be invoked: the constitutional mechanism for removing a president who is no longer fit for office.

Let's look at a real time example of news spin:

Exhibit A: Israel intercepts humanitarian flotilla headed to Gaza (Oct 2025)

You can see how completely different interpretations arise from shifts in which actors you name first, which verbs you choose, and what you leave out.

Let's examine the layers of spin:

1. Agent vs victim positioning

• Who is named (or omitted) as the actor?
• Who is the subject of the sentence?

2. Voice and verb choice

• Passive vs active voice (passive often erases responsibility)
• Soft verbs (“die”, “killed”) vs strong (“murdered”, “attacked”, “targeted”)

3. Order of information

• What comes first: the who (actor) or what happened (effect)? That shapes our immediate judgement.

4. What context is included or deleted

Historical background, motivations, power dynamics, responses, and reactions, including those that change the tilt of the narrative.

The payoff: empowered conversations

When you build this habit, you won’t just be better informed, you’ll also be harder to manipulate, and more confident in discussions. The upside is that you’ll be less likely to feel overwhelmed by the headlines.

Truth-seeking isn’t just about politics or world events. It’s about taking back your agency in a world where confusion is a tool of control.

It really is worth practising every single day, particularly at the speed and regularity the news comes across our focus.